Corporate Identity research at VU
The interest in corporate identity
at our faculty materialised during a lunch
lecture held on February 3, 2005.
Peter Peverelli presented the
model he is currently developing, which is to
be presented in monograph on
Chinese Corporate Identity published by
Routledge.
Peverelli’s main criticisms on the
bulk of current models:
-
They are static;
they focus on what the (intended) identity is, rather
than how it is constructed;
-
They are unidirectional; they fail to address the fact that how a company
wants others to see it is partly
related to how those others see the company;
-
they are singular; they presuppose that an enterprise has one single identity
and fail to take into account how the identity of a compay varies for
different ‘others.’
The most essential of his new
proposal are:
-
Corporate identity is part of the consequences of organising. A model
of corporate identity should
therefore be an organic part of a general
theory of organising;
-
Corporate identity is part of how a company makes sense of its relation
to social-cognitive structures and
how other social-cognitive structures
make sense of that company;
-
As social-cognitive structures themselves, companies are constructed by
their member actors. Organising of
individual actors in various inclusions
will affect the construction of
corporate identity.
Some of criticism of the meeting’s
discussant, Paul Jansen, were:
-
Peverelli’s definition is unclear, therefore a counter proposal:
-
Situation-relative self-interpretation of organization -> many identities in
many situations
-
Inspired by developmental
psychology”: Identity formation = creative construction by integrating
different self-images, identity = sameness.
You can download the following
files:
Peverelli’s
model + example case (pdf)
Peverelli’s
presentation (ppt)
Jansen’s reaction
(ppt)
Interested? Mail us your reaction.